![]() ![]() It seems like a waste of time to do that if it didn't contain real clues. Or, is it even possible he was a sick f-word and scribbled down dark thoughts and that there is no actual explanation in the manifesto? What do you think? Do note that he did take the time to even post this to tv channels and news channels. If so, the question still remains: what were those things he experienced on such an extreme emotional level that he felt only those strongest words could fit emotionally? Or, maybe he used grandiose and strong words (such as rape, shatter, holocaust, crucify, etc) metaphorically to make us understand how strongly he felt about some things in his life. This included 23 pages of photographs and. If that is the case here, the obvious hint here has to do with rape, bullying/torment, and maybe childhood trauma. Cho sent what has been described as a multimedia manifesto to MSNBC on the day of his at- tack at Virginia Tech. For example, the "Son of Sam" letters at first seems like crazy rantings, but actually contains clear and thought-through hints to people, locations and events important in the case. On the other hand, maybe words that at first seem as bizarre rants, actually contains very important hints that only a few people know what they refer to or means. But in some cases, the perpetrator is on a dafuq-level of "crazy" that his very own explanation only makes his motives more obscured and confusing for the world. Usually, a manifesto is meant to explain a perpetrator's motives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |